Home About
Five students,
one unreasonable idea.
That the way to fix a broken hiring signal is not a cleverer algorithm, but a person in a room watching somebody's code break — and writing down what they did next.
Who is building this.
We are students ourselves, which is the reason this problem was obvious to us and the reason we have no track record to point at. Both of those things are true at once.
Pranay
Founding team
Sumit
Founding team
Archit
Founding team
Shaqib
Founding team
Sahil
Founding team
What exists today,
and what does not.
| Asset | Status |
|---|---|
| Brand, logo and identity system | Complete |
| This website — public and live | Deployed |
| Enquiry capture into a database, with a private team dashboard | Built |
| Assistant with three-provider failover | Built and tested |
| Instagram · YouTube · LinkedIn | Secured |
| Task material and proctor protocol | Written, not yet run at scale |
| Assessment platform — automated fault injection | Roadmap |
| First college pilot | Next step |
Today a trained human proctor conducts the fault injection and the viva in person. Automated fault injection and an AI-assisted viva are roadmap, not product — and we say so here rather than let it be discovered.
What we are
not claiming.
- No pilot has run. No college has signed. No revenue has been earned.
- The assessment is much harder to cheat than a take-home test — never cheat-proof.
- The AI viva is not live. A person does it, today.
- Our survey tests that the problem is real, not that the product works.
- All pricing is our own model, not a rate anyone has yet paid.
We would rather present a smaller claim that survives a sceptical question than a larger one that does not. If you find something on this site that overstates what we have done, tell us and we will correct it.
Come and break the idea.
Whether you run a placement cell, hire engineers, or just think this is wrong — we would rather hear it now than after the first pilot.